18 November 2019
Comparatively few people across Australia would be missing Tony Abbott. Six months ago, while voters were using a Federal election to grant a third term in power to the Liberal Party, which he’d once led, he was in the process of losing his seat. One of the most divisive characters in Australian political history, he generated strong reactions everywhere with his views on many issues, so when he lost his seat, there were celebrations everywhere.
Of course, those celebrating his defeat were distraught to be seeing the Liberals win an election which, in the minds of many, they should’ve lost. After problems with leadership over time, and presumptions of dithering over various issues, they were rated no chance of winning the election. But under Scott Morrison, who become Liberal leader and Prime Minister the previous August, they pulled off what Morrison described as a miracle. Some Liberal policies were thought poisonous to many voters, and wrong in the minds of others – in the case of the latter, they were almost itching to see the Liberals lose office. When that never came about, there was shock and anger across the country.
Some of the leadership trouble afflicting the Liberals revolved around Abbott, who had the job for many years but was never popular among voters. Although he led the Liberals to an election win in 2013, it was more to do with the great unpopularity of his opponents, who were tearing themselves apart. He usually came across as a bully, rather than a persuader, and his unpopularity ultimately prompted Liberal MPs to dump him and turn to Malcolm Turnbull in September 2015. Turnbull only just held office at an election in 2016, and two years later, with Turnbull also turning out to be unpopular, he too was dumped as Liberal leader, with Morrison getting the job. Throughout that time, Abbott was often considered a key figure in the disquiet about Turnbull.
With an election due this year, environmental issues like climate change were thought likely to cost the Liberals victory. They’d been torn over tackling climate change for roughly a decade, particularly as pollution from industry and power generation were blamed for this. Some of them believed in taking action, while others argued that climate change didn’t even exist.
There were arguments about what tackling climate change would cost. Things like higher electricity prices, if they occurred, were perceived to be far too much for voters to tolerate. Many Liberals still seem to bicker over this now.
But voters were increasingly believing climate change to be serious as an issue, though they were arguably divided over how to deal with it. They saw droughts and water restrictions, which impacted how they cared for their cars and their gardens, as things resulting from climate change. Ultimately, however, at this year’s election, enough of them were so uneasy that the Liberals won.
That said, the unseating of Abbott was part of that concern about climate change, which Abbott didn’t believe to even exist. Voters in his seat of Warringah, lying in an affluent region in northern Sydney, were arguably among those prepared to bear any cost to tackle climate change. The Liberals hold seats in areas with similar affluence, and it was pointed out that in many seats there were swings against the Liberals, perhaps for this reason.
But it’s important to remember that, if not for the presence of an Independent candidate of some standing, Abbott would still be in Parliament now. Whatever voters in his seat thought of him, they could never bring themselves to support the Labor Party. Only an Independent candidate with some sort of profile had any chance of winning his seat.
In affluent areas, Labor is generally perceived as anti-wealth and anti-affluence, so voters can’t abide them, regardless of how they feel about the Liberals.
Indeed last year, when Turnbull resigned from Parliament after being dumped from the Liberal leadership, his seat of Wentworth, also located in an affluent area, fell to an Independent at a by-election. The Liberals regained Wentworth at this year’s election, but a point might’ve been made at the by-election.
There were decent swings against the Liberals in other affluent seats, including North Sydney and Goldstein and Higgins and Kooyong, in this year’s election.
Voters in those seats clearly weren’t happy with perceived inaction on climate change by the Liberals. While there might’ve been other issues, climate change was probably the major issue. The Liberals could count themselves lucky that those seats were safe enough to avoid changing hands. Although Abbott’s seat fell, it wouldn’t have happened without a popular Independent challenger.
Only the seat of Higgins, in southern Melbourne, is now deemed marginal, with Labor needing a swing of about 3-4 per cent to take it.
These results might represent a Liberal seat climate changing. As such, Liberal people would be uneasy, even though they’re not vulnerable to loss yet. Future elections might see more Liberal seats in affluent areas change with the climate.